Draftcandy #2: DTK Draft #1

Posted on April 17, 2015 by NovaSandler

You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “Draftcandy #2: DTK Draft #1”.

Noobeman on April 18, 2015 at 1:01 PM said:

Hello Noah,

Can you please elaborate on why you think Reduce in Stature is bad? If I were drafting, I would definitely pick and play it, so I was confused to see you barely even mention it.
NovaSandler on April 18, 2015 at 6:51 PM said:

I think Reduce is fine and was the correct pick over Silumgar’s Scorn. It was a mental error that I didn’t consider it.
Thomas on April 19, 2015 at 2:29 AM said:

Hello,

thanks for the vids. Can you elaborate what you consider the biggest difference (tempo, priorities, style, etc.) between Khans/Fate and this format? Thanks!
Jeff on April 20, 2015 at 12:47 PM said:

Awesome vids. I very much like how you talk through the whys of your decisions, extremely insightful. The academy might have unfortunately lost Marshall, but between you and Cribbs, I’ll definitely be coming back for more.
Tdoggy on April 22, 2015 at 7:50 PM said:

Gudul lurker is an ok card but shouldn’t evolving wilds be rated more highly because the rares in FR are so good.
NovaSandler on April 22, 2015 at 10:51 PM said:

Thomas: Being a 2 color set is the biggest difference. It’s a lot easier to stay open in the draft to find which colors are under-drafted.

Tdoggy: Lurker is always going to be good, where Wilds will be good some of the time.