You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “Eternal Warrior #25: It’s a Blue World”.
Eternal Warrior #25: It’s a Blue World
Posted on July 1, 2014 by RexDart
You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “Eternal Warrior #25: It’s a Blue World”.
Is snapcaster not viable?
Yeah, Snapcaster is totally viable. A bunch of blue decks are playing two copies, including the extremely popular UR Delver/Pyromancer/Gush deck.
In another type of deck, I would likely be using Snapcaster in the place of Strixes — they both essentially draw you a card and can trade with a lot of the creatures in the format. But in Tezzeret and in Goblin Welder decks, I use the Strixes instead for their obvious synergies.
Do you see this as a deck that could be budgeted down? I am curious what such a deck would look like sans power and maybe with a few more counters…Also how does this meld with the metalworker decks?
A power-less version of the deck would look something like the list I played back in Classic, which you can find at this link: http://www.mtgoacademy.com/eternal-warrior-6-whitey-ford-sings-the-blues/
You can see that I ran Lotus Petals instead of Moxen and also had Talisman of Dominance that I could play off an Ancient Tomb to get a Turn 2 Tezz. In that way, it was much more like the Legacy Tezzeret decks. The basic idea of having a control-combo deck with a backup plan of beating down with 5/5 creatures is the same, it’s just much more efficient and explosive with Power.
That Classic version of the deck needed a lot more tuning, I spent about two weeks trying out half a dozen blue decks and decided on that because I thought it was the most fun and had a shot in a field of other planeswalker decks. It also should have had a Vampiric Tutor in it, looking back now. Maybe I hadn’t bought that card yet as of the time that I had to register the decklist for that season’s league.